Kingdoms are either hereditary or they are new. If they are new then they have either been newly formed or newly acquired.
The people are either accustomed to being free, or they are accustomed to being under a prince.
Kingdoms are either acquired by force of arms, fortune (good luck) or ability.
In general, the people love hereditary princes more than princes established by acquisition
Princes of acquisition must deal with people accustomed to change. This creates difficulty. If they don't love the prince, then they will want to change him.
Advice: Keep the good will of the natives
In a situation where the prince has been overthrown, but lives to return and reacquire the kingdom, he will more firmly establish himself. This is because, when he returns, he can punish the rebels.
Advice when acquiring a kingdom where the language and customs of the people are the same as those of the main kingdom.
Advice when acquiring a kingdom where the laws and customs are different from those of the main kingdom
General advice
It is important to manage carefully the power structure that exists around you. Obligate where possible. Do not allow one to become too powerful. Doing this incorrectly causes failure of the acquisition.
CJG Comment: Keep the Minor Powers in Authority.
Never Split a Kingdom:If you don't have the power or will to take an entire kingdom, don't take only part of it. Don't share it with a coalition.
War is never to be avoided: Attempting to avoid war only defers it. Deferring war always works to your disadvantage.
Don't give up your kingdom for silly favors.
Never put a foreigner in charge of any portion of your kingdom.
Prince & Ministers with Slaves and Bondmen
Hard to take, but easy to hold (why? - CJG)
Prince and Barons
Easy to take but hard to hold
This seems to be based on the autonomy of the servants and the long memory of their emplacement. They have a history with the people.
If choosing between the two types, pick the first. However, in order to keep it from becoming like the second, you should continuously reorganize it.
That is: Move your people around to avoid the establishment of Barons.
Three ways to hold a one free city. (That is, a city that had its own laws.)
Ruin it
Live in it
Form an Oligarchy and take tribute from it.
If the third fails, do the first. The first is the most effective solution.
VI
Aim High – Walk on the path of great men. Do so even if you're not able. Archers without strength aim higher than their mark. Examples of those who with ability rose to princehood: Moses, Cyrus (Medes & Persians), Romulus (of Alba – King of Rome), Theseus (Athenians)
Moses was executing the will of God.
Opportunity and Ability
It is very dangerous to to take the lead in a new order.
Those who did well under the old order are going to be your enemies.
Those who may do well under the order are lukewarm defenders.
People won't believe the new until they experience it (CJG – How true in today's business world!)
It is better to hold by your own ability or force than by relying upon others.
VII
Those who quickly rise to power can quickly fall.
Lack of knowledge and No foundation
They must lay the foundation after the position is obtained.
(Examples: Francesco Sforza? - Means and Ability : Cesare Borgia – Fortune)
Foundations for Future Power
Conceal your mind.
Set the powers that be at odds with each other.
Depend as little as possible on the arms and luck of others.
Win over the opponent's forces “with honey” (Pull them to you.) (I have a note here “Prosperity” ... Don't know why I put it there. -CJG)
Use rebellions as advantages to expand. (They give you a reason to crush opposition.)
Use a swift & cruel governor to unite unruly portions of the empire, then, temper that man's authority by adding council. (Note: This leans toward the rule of law. - CJG) After peace has been restored, execute the governor so you don't take the blame for the cruelty.
<Mach reviews some history here>
VII Wicked Ascension
Agothocles, a Sicilian potter's son, set his mind to become prince and resolved “...to seize by violence, without obligation to others, that which had been conceded to him by assent.”
Recently, Hillary handed Obama the democratic party nomination by assent. She appeared to be doing him a favor by endorsing him and handing him her voters. However, something conceded to someone by assent is not necessarily earned. If he doesn't (and he didn't) earn the votes of the women, then he has them under obligation to Hillary. Also, we have seen that these votes were stolen from him when McCain nominated Senator Palin for Vice President
Wicked methods for seizing by violence that which was conceded.
The Methods
Slaying fellow citizens
Deceiving friends
being without faith, mercy, or religion
Gain you empire without glory
Personal note. Mach is not advocating wicked methods. In my analysis above, I make it seem as though Obama should have seized “by violence” (or earned) the votes that Sen. Clinton gave him. This is not what Mach is showing. So, some further study is needed.
Evil deeds are tolerable only in the interest of security. Just be judicious about it.
Examine the injuries you need to inflict and do them all in one stroke.
Decrease the injuries over time. They should not be constant or increasing.
Slowly begin to eek out benefits little by little.
Be consistent in your behavior. (BRANDING!) Don't let circumstances change your behavior.
A Sudden display of harshness is too little too late.
A Sudden release of benefits makes them appear to be forced from you.
IX pusillanimity – being timid, unresolved, cowardly
Bind your nobles to your fortune. If the nobles are with you, they will win the people.
Mach seems to categorize nobles at this point.
Bold nobles who are not bound to your fortune are to be considered enemies.
Fearful nobles who are not bound are useful, but it is not clear in what sense.
Nice nobles who are bound to your fortune can be considered as friends
Rapacious nobles who are bound to your fortune are an unknown factor. (Study to see if you missed it – CJG)
NOTE: Don't expect the people to come to your aid, but expect the people to rebel if you repress them.
Make the citizens dependent on you. (Co-dependent?)
Watch out for magistrates. The people get used to taking orders from them instead of from you. They gain the loyalty of the people.
People are bound as much by what they confer as by what they receive.
?
Foundation for keeping your kingdom
Good laws
Strong arms
Mach says strong arms lead to good laws. (I challenge this because we have examples of kingdoms with lousy laws but strong arms, so not sure where he gets this ~ CJG)
Arms
Watch out for Merks. They are all bravado and no substance. (Hype!)
You can defend your kingdom with a mixture of personal arms and merks.
You MUST have your own army.
In a republic, the citizens MUST fight.
If merks get too strong, they tend to turn on their masters.
Auxiliaries
Using auxiliaries is bad because if they lose, you lose. If they win, you are their captive. (It is not clear what Mach means by Auxiliaries. It might be help from another prince. Webster seems to concur. ~CJG)
It occurs to me that a prince might use auxiliaries against a minor foe. The end being to weaken the prince providing the auxiliaries. Remuneration comes in the form of plunder from the minor foe.
A real victory is not gained with the arms of others.
Maintain your own military by any means.
Command loyalty
Primary Education Objective – War, Its rules, and discipline
War should continually be in a prince's thoughts
Peace time is a time for action and study
Know the terrain by experiencing it.
In action, you will also come to know the terrain of other countries.
Study
Read history
Imitate the greats
Base your actions on how people live, not on how people ought to live.
Know when it is necessary to do wrong.
Examine carefully virtues and vices
Avoid vices that will cause you to lose your state.
Some virtues may lead to ruin while some vices may lead to security and prosperity.
It appears to me (CJG) that Mach is trying to say that morality, while praiseworthy, is not to be considered when making state decisions. Consider only what will keep your state. Note however, that some Bible cases show that while making the right moral decision may cause the loss of a kingdom for a time, but will bring about a greater kingdom later. That said, there are cases where wholesale slaughter has been the decision of great Bible leaders. So, weighing Mach's point of view against the Bible bears consideration.
Liberty leads either to being impoverished & despised or rapacious & hated. Because, you end up giving everything away. Since a prince should avoid being despised or hated, institute a practice of “meanness”. (Be a tightwad.) This brings reproach without hatred because you have enough to attack & defend but you aren't filling everyone's wishes.
It is quite alright to spend other people's money wontonly (gains from pillaging, etc.) because it gives you a reputation for liberality without reducing your own coffers.
On the way to becoming a prince, buy your way up with liberality, but end that practice immediately after reaching the top.
It is better to be considered clement than cruel, but don't overdo it. Too much mercy leads to murders, robbers, etc.
Maintain a proper balance between mistrust & confidence. Be loved and feared or only be feared but not hated. Do not be loved only. Men tend to have less trouble betraying one loved than they do one feared.
Don't touch the property and women of the citizens. Men more quickly forget the death of their father than the loss of their patrimony. Taking property is too easy and becomes addictive. Taking a life requires justification and so will happen less.
Leave the affairs of reproach to others while you do those of grace.
Love the nobles, but not to the point of offending the people.
Three things to fight against:
Note however, that if you must have one of these groups hate you, be hated by the least powrful of them. (This is probably true in general ~CJG)
Here, Machiavelli seems to run through a litany of former leaders.
Advice: Do no grave injuries to those around you.
Advice: Be careful which hero you choose to immitate. If you fail to measure up properly, or if the conditions ar edifferent, you may fail utterly. Instead take those admirable pieces from each hero and apply them as you can and as is fit in the situation.
Princes fail because they forget the people and tend to rest on their past accomplishments. People are more interested in the present than the past. Keep the people comfortable with good laws, well protected with a good army, have good allies, and be a good example.
Keep the people friendly to the prince.
We have about half control over our own actions. Our lives are not left entirely to chance. We can hedge against chance.
The successful prince will conform his methods to the times. If times and conditions change, change your methods accordingly. This is difficult in general. Know that it is better to be adventurous than cautious.
This last section seems to be a plea to liberate Italy from its current rule. Not sure, didn't take notes ~CJG